Basket
{{item.CourseTitle}}
Price: {{item.ItemPriceExVatFormatted}} {{item.Currency}}
When it comes to Microsoft certification training, most companies face a critical decision early on: Should we enroll our team in live, instructor-led training, or let them learn at their own pace with self-paced courses?
On the surface, both options seem viable. Self-paced learning is flexible, accessible, and usually cheaper upfront. Live training, on the other hand, brings structure, real-time support, and the accountability of a classroom experience - even if it’s virtual. But dig a little deeper, and the stakes become clear.
The choice you make here can significantly impact your team’s ability to actually learn, apply, and certify. A poor training fit can result in disengaged learners, lower certification success rates, and ultimately, teams that are unprepared for the real-world demands of Microsoft-powered environments like Azure, Microsoft 365, Security, Power Platform, and more.
And in today’s fast-moving tech landscape, there’s little room for wasted time or second chances. So what’s the smarter move?
In this article, we’ll break down the strengths and limitations of both models, live instructor-led vs self-paced, and guide you toward the training format that best suits your team, your goals, and your bottom line.
Live training means your team learns in real time, with a certified Microsoft instructor guiding the process. These sessions mimic a classroom experience but online, and include opportunities for Q&A, hands-on labs, group discussions, and mentorship.
IT teams often prefer this approach because it brings accountability and engagement.
Scheduled sessions keep learners on pace. The presence of a real instructor means questions don’t go unanswered. And the depth of learning tends to be greater, as instructors don’t just recite content; they tailor explanations to the learners in the room.
When teams learn together, they also benefit from shared language, shared understanding, and shared momentum. That can pay dividends when it comes to real-world collaboration.
One IT Manager in the telecom sector shared: “We used to rely on recorded courses. But since switching to live sessions, our certification pass rate shot up by 40%.”
Self-paced training gives employees the flexibility to learn when they want, how they want. These programs are typically made up of pre-recorded video content, PDFs, and quizzes. Many online platforms like Coursera, Udemy, and LinkedIn Learning fall into this category.
This model works well for independent learners who are self-motivated and able to block out regular time to study. It can also be a fit for teams with unpredictable workloads who find it difficult to commit to fixed class schedules.
Cost is another factor. Self-paced courses often have a lower up-front price tag, which makes them appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
However, the strengths of self-paced learning often don’t hold up under pressure, especially when certification, speed, and depth of learning are priorities.
Many organizations have learned the hard way that self-paced doesn’t always mean successful. Completion rates for self-paced courses are notoriously low. Without structure, many learners stall out after a few modules. Motivation fades. And even those who finish often struggle to apply what they learned.
Another issue is relevance. Content on on-demand platforms can quickly become outdated. If a course is based on last year’s Microsoft certification requirements, it won’t prepare your team for this year’s exam. And when there’s no instructor to guide the learning, employees are left guessing.
When your goal is team-wide certifications in Microsoft technologies like Azure, Power Platform, or Microsoft 365, speed and consistency matter. Live training ensures everyone learns the same content at the same time, reducing knowledge gaps across the team.
Live instruction also enables teams to ask industry-specific questions and get real-time answers. The hands-on labs included in live sessions simulate real work environments. This not only prepares learners for exams but also helps them apply skills on the job.
Perhaps most importantly, live training creates a direct connection between training and project readiness. Managers can track progress, see who’s engaging, and tie learning to key outcomes.
Self-paced training isn’t inherently bad; it just needs the right use case. It can be valuable for:
To make self-paced learning more effective, pair it with check-ins, study groups, or access to live mentors. This hybrid approach adds a layer of accountability and support.
Some organizations choose a blended model, combining live sessions with recorded materials and ongoing mentorship. This allows learners to benefit from the structure and support of live instruction while revisiting key material at their own pace.
At Readynez, we’ve found this approach drives the best results. Our live Microsoft training is backed by preparation materials, labs, and expert Q&A. Learners get the confidence of real-time interaction, with the flexibility to review whenever needed.
When it comes to engagement, speed, real-world readiness, and pass rates, live training clearly outperforms. Self-paced learning may seem easier to manage at first glance, but the lack of structure and support often leads to poor outcomes.
Live training, especially when delivered by expert instructors and backed by real labs, accelerates certification and job readiness. If you want to build a certified, high-performing Microsoft team, live training isn’t just better, it’s essential.
If your team is serious about earning Microsoft certifications and using those skills on real projects, then live training is a better investment.
Readynez Unlimited Microsoft Training gives your team access to over 60 Microsoft certification courses, all live, all instructor-led. Sessions include:
It’s designed to help your team certify faster, retain more, and perform better in their roles.
Get Unlimited access to ALL the LIVE Instructor-led Microsoft courses you want - all for the price of less than one course.